Righteous anger...What is it??
I have written about those who have prayed with me. Some are very committed charismatics and I claim they are among the least catechized of many catholics. In fact the actions of the Chancery Office in Boston as they try to squash the Blogs in Boston are both insulting and seem to be the defense of desperate curates caught like bad little boys with their hands in the cookie jar. These are Blogs that give proof and ably demonstrate the pompous pontifications of the poorly catechetical educations of those in the Chancery Office. I mean those, whose private opinions are private revelations of what The Church teaches and are so far off base they should be told by Roman Hierarchs they are schismatics.
Those who were polite enough and also interested enough to read those former blogs of mine concerning the untrustworthy actions of some friends of mine, close friends I remember, may remember I do not hold their actions against them, rather I hold no feelings of animosity of any sort. We do greet each other when we meet and although I get the feeling from them, they wished either I went away or they were somewhere else. Also to those who have read what I written you will know also of my feelings for their attempts to twist, spin is better and more apt summation of their deeds, the Church's teachings on anger, peace judgment etc. These are weapons used by many as again I have described previously,used to stave off the irritations of their uninformed consciences. Sometimes I cannot understand from an intellectual point of view the silliness of what drives them. They have knowledge of words but no intelligence of what they mean. To me not comprehending what words in the Catechism mean is sinful and is a form of pride. When actions I am describing are meaningless let me tell you of a man whom I meet with often. He says he likes our conversations as they are the only intellectual exercise he gets nowadays. That is a complement I think but then he says he never has time for reading and what I e-mail him he has no time for my correspondence yet he can quote chapter and verse published in the local newspapers. He often fumes at the local Catholic Newspaper and cannot understand, never stops trying to get me to discuss the secular news. I mean NEVER stops and NEVER listens when I explain I have other articles and books about the Church I wish to read.
I want to explain about anger, my anger which sometimes he describes as a brutal frankness or anger at him and others. I ask you all as I am entitled to,"What has happened to righteous anger?" or as I was also instructed, "justifiable indignation". This is allowed and if I remember it correctly, it is also praiseworthy if we have the inclination driven that is, by a need to inflict a justifiable punishment for the error that causes our wrath as long as it is a sincere wish to put to rights what harm has been done.
So bishops and chancery office Wizards, Merlins and spin doctors as you have spiritually desecrated the House of God with your personal predilection to foster homosexuality, to protect pedophiles, to fund missionary work that supports abortions and birth control teachings and then lie about it. Lie even when photographs and advertisements tell us different. When you put a spin on the money given you for Charity. When you make our offerings sinful do you think of Christ who took a rope's end, probably the halter from from some donkey to chastise donkeys who charged poor people for imperfect offerings for their temple sacrifices. You took our donations and gave it to advertise murders, to advise dreadful men they could commit sodomy with impunity. You made our offerings sinful to float your egos on some morass of evil inclinations. When I look at your behavior and think of God and His discussion with Abraham over finding good men, I certainly would not look in the Chancery Offices in Boston or many other offices in the Black SEES in North America
What I have written I think falls within the righteous anger teachings of the Church It is certainly not and cannot be described as the calumnies and detraction the Bishops are using and trying to describe the blogs of righteously angered catholics faithful to the Church.
As for naughty boys and cookie jars, it might help you to see these bloggers as Mothers and Fathers giving you the spanking your childish actions deserve
Labels: calumny detraction Righteous anger justifiable indignation