All Conversations in My Heart
Friday, July 13, 2012
  Is this a valid and truthful statement?
I must apologize due to terrible head virus that lasted three weeks, I published here the first version of my attempt of the following . Thank you to those who gave me their corrections. Here is my corrected version.


As I wrote in my last blog, which by the way, for which I maintain there is no reason for me to apologize,. Yes there are many who considered it a disgusting rant. They made types of ad hominem rants against my thoughts. Surprisingly these communications did not contain not one denial of any truth or accusations of falseness found in the previous blog. These responses did determine this blog/rant is not Holy Spirit inspired. Why not, does not the Holy Ghost, the Divine Eternal Spirit of God's supernatural love and sanctifying grace become disturbed by any unholy antics of the members of the Church or the priesthood? What are your or my opinions worth, if they do not stem from a worry about the eternal life of grace for our brothers and sisters in Christ, especially of the priesthood? Do we all forget or deny the priesthood contrary to their egos are the servants of the Laity? Are they not teachers of the Word who died to save us? It almost seems many declare "not us" I for one do get alarmed when I get a symbolic pat on the head from a priestand hear the unspoken words, “Father knows best”.
Those who wrote to correct me and my opinions have made criticisms that are invalid. These criticisms are valueless in comparison to the loss of souls. They must, and we must, be concerned for our eternal salvation. Is this not a definition of true evangelization? Opinions are all worthless if one's personal ego becomes more important than the reason for the sacrifice Jesus made to save us. Can you, who criticize from a view I find is ignorant of the Church's historical teachings, truly say what is right or wrong? All our opinions have value,. Unfortunately so many progressives in the Church today do not consider the works of Christ and the dreadful price He paid for our salvation. No you cannot, if you did you would have true humility. Our opinions will have great value if they arise from the practice of the mystical life. A life only gained and earned by the aesthetic practice of the rites, the liturgical ceremonies and prayers of the one holy, catholic, apostolic and papal church. Notice I did not contaminate the description by using the unholy meaning of spiritual as it is used today. I would like to describe all mystical Catholics and would that it could be true by the use of righteous or holy. Righteous as is God in heaven. I mean a great value we could claim if we were truly prayerful and pray according to the Holy Spirit of Discipline and use the Holy Sacramental Mysteries of the above church,. The promise that carries eternal salvation, that, victorious, glorious triumphant life in everlasting grace.
One priest who wrote, whom I know well from attending his liturgies sometimes, now reading once again his opinion of me, I make the same offer made to him before. I will come to each of his weekend masses, to apologize for my rudeness and insulting behavior if he will at each mass, I attend, give a homily on the Papal, infallible, prophetic teaching in “Humanae Vitae”. Will the offer be accepted? He never did and no other priests ever have. Says a lot for their faith, obedience and priesthood doesn't it? Even I might add to the use of their conscience. I often wonder if the old Jesuit tenet applies anymore, “Judgment, right or wrong, then use of an informed conscience and then to make the burden of choice.
Allow me to answer other comments, I have heard and received. Comments such as “You catch more flies with honey. Not for me, I confess, flies carry disease. Next is I would be better off if I quietly fraternally corrected them. This is another misinterpretation we Catholics have received from the pseudo Christians, who are truly catechumens as yet falsely catechized. We have added dreadful many of their misinterpretations of scriptural phrases, phrases such as judgment, love, fraternal correction, custody of the eyes, peace, unity and others we all hear day to day and used, in ignorance of scriptures. Never do we use the sword Christ has given us .remembering well what it will do. Scared as we are at the consequences He promised with His Gift. We tend to sheaf it rather to loose our souls and the souls of our brothers and sisters in Christ. Yes we do and we would be better off we admit our errors. Used I claim to stifle our consciences. Not for me, I prefer to be corrected by Scriptures. Examples we find by reading Scriptures IN A STATE OF GRACE and found there as examples of the Word of Christ. How many who read this can say what a state of grace is or rather as I have heard it, a the state of the grace that sanctifies. That means righteous and in heaven even here on earth. We use these examples falsely and without humility and in ways certainly not Christlike. Humility is a weapon so often used to curb truth, used I might say as, you should be kissing my feet, not correcting me”. Look at the ways so many use the phrase “custody of the eyes” It is used to ignore sins committed, before our very eyes. Used as a sinful form of tolerance. We are frightened more of the sinners' reactions than of the results of the sin itself. One of the most dreadful sins in the church today is the sin by where we rationalize our sins to deny others any holiness in those others. This used to make us aware that we cannot be as Holy as yourself. It does happen, ask any pentecostal and know they speak in tongues it is a gift of the Holy Spirit. You don't. Sin is the death of our souls, if we are not careful. God said in scriptures, “All souls are mine and the soul that sins dies (to Me). The way in which I have heard priests use in the confessional when for example one confesses to watching a member of the parish , not named, yet behaving badly or in one case sinfully, then saying nothing. “Do not look, guard your eyes”, I have been told. Is this not a case of sinful blindness on my part. I know so. I urge you all do not have to told by god of your error after you leave this world., Your sin of leading someone into the abyss? In the Church today” Many, so many, of us are illiterate when it comes to a knowledge of sin and therefore of repentance and satisfaction. Did not a Cardinal, a member of the Roman Curia, recommend this last week that it is important that the adults in the Church must be catechized. I notice he did not say re-catechized. Many of us taught by what is all too often, an ungraceful sacrificial priesthood who love us to bask in our ignorance. It gives them a form of peace and in another badly used phrase “a sense of unity” and peace. I mean he can claim there is no dissension in the Parish (no one writes to the Bishop about his behavior). Of course if the one with a question or complaint of another's catholic actions is a liberal, progressive modernist then a maximum effort is expended by the Priest, to answer or placate. If the questioner is a truly practicing catholic, then the priest can command the poor unfortunate soul to be quiet and know he will be obeyed. I have seen in this diocese strong pressure by the local ordinary (retired) against the Rosary when a group of liberal progressives, in the adjoining parish complained. The charismatic group complained the rosary prayers should be made to join them. I guess he figured the Rosary Group, who outnumbered the misled enthusiasts were against “unity” in the parish. Personally when I organized a Rosary group locally, who gathered together every weekday at 6 pm for the Angelus and Rosary, the parish priest did all he could to stop us. Time and time again I asked the priest to join us without success. The Bishop knew and ignored the situation. It was as another priest stated, “This Bishop is no Father to me”.
Look at the use of the word 'peace'. There are two kinds of peace; one, when the devil leaves us alone. Why does the filth not bother us?” We say, “Peace where there is no peace”. Face up to it my friends the wickedness of filth has us and he does not bother with sneaky conversations with our minds. One; he has us and has no worries about the state of our soul or; two, we must go through his dreadful temptations, as he fights to get us back. He does this in so many ways. He gained Adam's and Eve's souls with the eating of the fruit of the tree of knowledge. Ever wonder why God slung them so peremptorily out of Eden. Just imagine how it would have been for God when they went after and ate, under the instructions of filth, the fruit of the Tree of Life. It has taken 'til now for us, we of the present generation to do this. Doctors, lawyers and Politicians do so today to become powerful and rich and never make atonement or doing penance in this world for their obscene management of creation.
These temptations, that sometimes are for us, a dreadful mental battle, must give us on personal reflection, give us a strong indication of our sinlessness and of an indwelling of the Holy Spirit. This last statement is worthy of belief. We must acknowledge, because of these harsh personal times of internal spiritual warfare, we can know the truth of our interior grace. The devil wants us and is determined for us to share his life of eternal hatred and misery. I thank God it is very few priests who are the kind described above. For myself the harder the temptations are to avoid, the more St Paul is apparent and understandable. It is certainly a different understanding than the teachings of Luther. Read again Rom 5:20 and 21. “The law was interposed that sin might be multiplied, but where sin hath been multiplied Grace abounds yet more”. This means to me the more we are tempted and we resist it is only, when we ask for His help, that His abounding Grace strengthens us and overcomes sin .
I pity the majority of the Parish Priest in our Church today. Since the Council of Vatican 2 the priests are expected to each and every Maundy Thursday to place their hands into the Bishop and vow to obey him. It used to be the priest vowed to defend the Church against modernity. If the Bishop is a trifle confused about Church teaching and, as is so apparent, hold opinions at odds with Church teachings then the priest's conscience means nothing and he will sin even when he knows better. I hold this opinion to be true by the way from the Church's teaching on the all encompassing role of the episcopal priest. All priests derive their priesthood from this exalted apostolic priesthood thus ensuring that all their priestly action are derived specifically from the priesthood of the bishop who incardinates him and the bishops in the college of bishops who consecrated the priest's bishop. One sins they all sin unless fraternal correction is applied, but to where and to whom is the million dollar question ? I wrote and asked a bishop once this question, “ Why such a vow? What happened to Christ's words, “If you love Me, you will keep my commandments”. How conceited it is for the bishops to works against the natural law/ Is there not a hint that it is the bishop not God who grants vocations. It is bordering on if not scandalous. I ask what is love worth if it condemns a soul into sharing eternal damnation?

Forward this to your parish priest and ask if it is believable. I wonder what he will say? Watch the struggle in his eyes and pity him.



Labels: , , , ,

 
Memories of the habits and the teachings of the Catholic Church

Archives
11 June 2006 / 18 June 2006 / 25 June 2006 / 02 July 2006 / 09 July 2006 / 16 July 2006 / 17 December 2006 / 31 December 2006 / 07 January 2007 / 14 January 2007 / 21 January 2007 / 04 February 2007 / 18 February 2007 / 04 March 2007 / 18 March 2007 / 25 March 2007 / 01 April 2007 / 08 April 2007 / 15 April 2007 / 22 April 2007 / 29 April 2007 / 13 May 2007 / 03 June 2007 / 08 July 2007 / 29 July 2007 / 05 August 2007 / 12 August 2007 / 19 August 2007 / 26 August 2007 / 16 September 2007 / 07 October 2007 / 13 January 2008 / 27 January 2008 / 03 February 2008 / 10 February 2008 / 24 February 2008 / 02 March 2008 / 09 March 2008 / 16 March 2008 / 23 March 2008 / 30 March 2008 / 06 April 2008 / 13 April 2008 / 27 April 2008 / 04 May 2008 / 11 May 2008 / 18 May 2008 / 25 May 2008 / 01 June 2008 / 08 June 2008 / 15 June 2008 / 29 June 2008 / 06 July 2008 / 13 July 2008 / 27 July 2008 / 03 August 2008 / 10 August 2008 / 17 August 2008 / 24 August 2008 / 31 August 2008 / 07 September 2008 / 14 September 2008 / 28 September 2008 / 05 October 2008 / 12 October 2008 / 19 October 2008 / 26 October 2008 / 02 November 2008 / 23 November 2008 / 30 November 2008 / 07 December 2008 / 14 December 2008 / 28 December 2008 / 04 January 2009 / 11 January 2009 / 25 January 2009 / 01 February 2009 / 08 February 2009 / 15 February 2009 / 22 February 2009 / 01 March 2009 / 08 March 2009 / 22 March 2009 / 29 March 2009 / 05 April 2009 / 12 April 2009 / 19 April 2009 / 26 April 2009 / 10 May 2009 / 17 May 2009 / 24 May 2009 / 31 May 2009 / 07 June 2009 / 14 June 2009 / 21 June 2009 / 28 June 2009 / 05 July 2009 / 12 July 2009 / 19 July 2009 / 26 July 2009 / 02 August 2009 / 09 August 2009 / 16 August 2009 / 30 August 2009 / 06 September 2009 / 13 September 2009 / 20 September 2009 / 04 October 2009 / 11 October 2009 / 15 November 2009 / 29 November 2009 / 06 December 2009 / 13 December 2009 / 20 December 2009 / 27 December 2009 / 10 January 2010 / 24 January 2010 / 31 January 2010 / 07 February 2010 / 28 February 2010 / 07 March 2010 / 21 March 2010 / 28 March 2010 / 02 May 2010 / 09 May 2010 / 30 May 2010 / 13 June 2010 / 27 June 2010 / 11 July 2010 / 18 July 2010 / 25 July 2010 / 01 August 2010 / 08 August 2010 / 15 August 2010 / 22 August 2010 / 29 August 2010 / 05 September 2010 / 12 September 2010 / 19 September 2010 / 26 September 2010 / 10 October 2010 / 24 October 2010 / 31 October 2010 / 07 November 2010 / 14 November 2010 / 21 November 2010 / 28 November 2010 / 05 December 2010 / 12 December 2010 / 19 December 2010 / 26 December 2010 / 09 January 2011 / 16 January 2011 / 23 January 2011 / 30 January 2011 / 06 February 2011 / 13 February 2011 / 06 March 2011 / 24 April 2011 / 08 May 2011 / 15 May 2011 / 22 May 2011 / 03 July 2011 / 17 July 2011 / 24 July 2011 / 31 July 2011 / 07 August 2011 / 14 August 2011 / 21 August 2011 / 25 September 2011 / 09 October 2011 / 16 October 2011 / 04 December 2011 / 25 December 2011 / 08 January 2012 / 15 January 2012 / 22 January 2012 / 29 January 2012 / 17 June 2012 / 08 July 2012 / 05 August 2012 / 21 October 2012 / 28 October 2012 / 04 November 2012 / 11 November 2012 / 18 November 2012 / 02 December 2012 / 30 December 2012 / 06 January 2013 / 13 January 2013 / 20 January 2013 / 03 February 2013 / 10 February 2013 / 17 February 2013 / 10 March 2013 / 17 March 2013 / 24 March 2013 / 31 March 2013 / 05 May 2013 / 26 May 2013 / 02 June 2013 / 09 June 2013 / 16 June 2013 / 23 June 2013 / 30 June 2013 / 07 July 2013 / 14 July 2013 / 28 July 2013 / 11 August 2013 / 18 August 2013 / 25 August 2013 / 29 September 2013 / 08 December 2013 / 15 December 2013 / 22 December 2013 / 29 December 2013 / 19 January 2014 / 26 January 2014 / 02 February 2014 / 09 March 2014 / 18 May 2014 / 25 May 2014 / 29 June 2014 / 06 July 2014 / 10 August 2014 / 24 August 2014 / 21 September 2014 / 12 October 2014 / 26 October 2014 / 23 November 2014 / 01 February 2015 / 08 March 2015 / 22 March 2015 / 12 July 2015 / 19 July 2015 / 26 July 2015 / 09 August 2015 / 16 August 2015 / 20 September 2015 / 27 September 2015 / 01 November 2015 / 06 December 2015 / 06 March 2016 / 20 March 2016 / 24 April 2016 / 01 May 2016 / 04 September 2016 / 25 September 2016 / 02 October 2016 / 13 November 2016 / 20 November 2016 / 01 January 2017 / 22 January 2017 /


Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]