THIS IS NOT WOOLY OR SPIN THEOLOGY or any theology at all
Matthew 10 26
Therefore fear them not. For nothing is covered that shall not be
revealed: nor hid, that shall not be known.
That which I tell you in the dark, speak ye in the light: and that
which you hear in the ear, preach ye upon the housetops. And fear ye not them that kill the body, and are not able to kill the
soul: but rather fear him that can destroy both soul and body in
hell. Are not two sparrows sold for a farthing? and not one of them shall
fall on the ground without your Father.
But the very hairs of your head are all numbered.
is certainly strongly influenced by Jesuits. I was brought up in
England. A country, whose
faithful, under fire, was nurtured,
of Elizabeth 1st.,
by Jesuit Priests. The
arrival of these Jesuits
a long queue of priests, who
they were guaranteed martyrdom.
Even until the late
were still jailed for being priests. The Jesuit teachings still are
in common usage
the church as
cannot hide from them. The
Jesuit teachings on Grace are still valid
“off the cuff” remarks which Francis, by
never qualifies, but dangles them out there for personal
tradition of vatican 2 with double entendres, just
like the pronouncements made
by the council in the 1960's.
is a “hail fellow well met” kind of simple
I hope to be proven wrong. We
can claim there is a lack
of good catechesis among the majority of the churchmen who support,
with great alarm at the doubt many of us older catholics show, their
views of vatican. They proclaim to the Church that it is
misunderstood and never really tell us where.
must count among these misunderstandings those changes in dogma. This
is what we need explained in a simple comprehensible manner. Tell me
this article is wrong and how did vatican 2 come to change it?
of the more erudite of the Prelates call our attention to the lack of
good catechesis and it is, for the others, a matter of business as
was taught from the Penny Catechism of England and I have converted a
few and never lost and argument with the gentiles and pseudo
christians when I have used it as a reference point. Whether
is good or bad only time will tell, and
it is that time now.
We are repeating the results of this type of catechesis which
still promoted by the same individuals that originated this
catechist or RCIA
the time of the Pastoral Council of the sixties. At
this moment in time
can we assess what kind of pastoral news it was?
am happy that
doctrine and Ignatian Spirituality may
a child in England we were taught the Jesuit
perfect contrition. There
were many other things we were taught and I
remember being told, “Make sure you know to
you are praying, if God does not hear you satan will”. We
were taught to
Spiritual Exercises of St. Ignatius, the greatest examination of
by Man as an
self meditation and also
brilliant form of perfect contrition.
I hear the claim regularly,
confess my sins to God”. It
our Church today.
this is so, why then did He
have to die for us? The
Hebrews offered a special sacrifice for sin. They could not achieve
salvation until Christ suffered and died. Has nothing changed in the
eyes of the liberal obscurantists, who do not need to confess to the
minister of forgiveness, the Catholic Priest. Is
for them in an unstated, hidden
fact, the Messiah and the forgiveness of sin has not yet arrived? Did
their thoughts truly
need to die? The sacrament of the Holy Eucharist is not so important
when compared with the god
of their ideas. Where are the great thinkers in the Catholic Church
today who can see ahead and call out warnings for the safety of our
is happening to us spiritually?
Contrition is not understood for
what it truly is.
by its meaning and use makes it
a nice, egotistical
phrase that allows us to take no responsibility for the malicious
actions against Jesus Christ and His sacrificial
acts of His Life. It
is nothing more on some lips as a pejorative phrase,
way of belittling the ancient sacramental acts we Catholics used to
revere. But I wonder if anyone remembers
the priests know? Do they know.
If they do I have never
what it is and what constitutes its form as expressed by the Church
I write most priests cannot begin to teach it or with the lack of
confessions surely it would have been taught. There are strong
unchangeable reasons for its sucessful use. Yet it seems to be
disgustingly bowdlerized just as is general absolution. I would like
to see some prelate or other explain why vatican 2 changed its use.
In fact let us not hear vatican 2 didn't but rather an explanation
why in the new church of vatican 2 it was changed and why.
work of a
Jesuit Priest in London gave
the various 12 step programmes, adapted
from the same Spiritual Works.
in some way you have a bondage to sin, that is a sinful habit,
properly used the Ignation
works will rid you of it. The
demand or instructions on how it works contains the admonition to
confess weekly. The
Catholic Truth Society
mostly written by Jesuits
contain good examples of Catholic Teachings.
some of them. Find many at the following web address.
were the theological writers that gave the English
religious Education, until the Sisters came to teach the catechism.
have digressed as usual so I will return to what I started to write
but was moved off course. I wish to tell
what is the real Good News
about how the Divine Intellect that
comes to us by
the state of the grace, at
baptism, or after confession, or by the last rites, can only be
infused by an ordained catholic Priest.
comes with the state of grace that sanctifies
helps us to
understand so many spiritual acts and meanings.
grace that sanctifies guarantees
by Christ's promises, “Where
I am the Father
is to”. That
the Paraclete, the Divine Eternal Spirit of God's Love, the
unbreakable bond of love of
indissoluble love that travels reciprocally
proceeds through the Father and the Son and goes between
Father and the Son
will come to
remind us of what Jesus actually said. Without the Church's
sacramental actions in
the confessional that
just does not happen. That
is part of the promise of Christ, when He said, “I will send the
Paraclete to remind you”.
must be understood, by
us all, and it is part, a huge part of our faith that
without the state of grace that precious indwelling of the Holy
Spirit, we do not comprehend clearly or deeply what God is telling us
through Christ, Blessed Mary or the Prophets. We
have only our own opinions and can anyone, whatever our
egos and lack of humility, really
say they are any more than our own private revelations. We
end up with our own interpretations treating them according to modern
They are nothing more than holding our own thoughts as private
revelations and claiming
shamefully uncorrectable for this is what the Holy Spirit tells me.
we must hold to be completely untrue.
modern way is to dismiss the traditional teachings of the Church and
forge new interpretations of old doctrines and words. A very good
example of this are the modern meanings given to Scriptures which
today are even made
erroneous by the fallacies of Hebrew translations that came from the
Masorete, Aaron ben Asher, in the 1100's. He
changed the Hebrew cantillation marks and accents because they were
in many cases fly specks, paper imperfections and dirt specks.
which we were warned of by St Justin Martyr in his “Dialogue with
Trypho the Jew, Chapter 71”.
me ask and you answer honestly if you can or want to? Would God share
His temple with His enemy? Remember we leave God's family when we
have original sin shadowing our souls and mortal sin even more grave
us back to the family of foolish evil. Confession is
a present from a providential God who died to save us from sin. A
providential God who knew we would sin
again and again. Let
me ask it in another way one that concerns us all personally as
is one of us in
the way we were meant to be.
Think of Blessed
Mary and answer this, “Would God put His seed in a dirty cup? How
many of you are in denial over the true answer?
a typical modern viewpoint we need only to consider The Story of
might be as
it is described by modern authors, be they priests or laity, as
Corinthians 1 Verse 12. So
I ask those of you who are reading this, “On the question of Fatima
who are you for?” I
must answer that after
The Holy Trinity and Jesus. I am for Blessed Mary. Yet
so many priests and laymen have written commentaries on
Fatima that are fatuous in the extreme. They
miss the point
completely misinform the
Laity. It makes the whole premise of Fatima
a time of confusion, befouled by so many erroneous opinions. Lucia in
of Fatima” written by Fr
de Oliveira who, acted with
the authority of the Bishop of Fatima and
under the inprimatur of the Primate of Lisbon,
tells of the dreadful questioning by
who it seems were not authorized by the local ordinary and pressured
the three children with inquisitional style questioning. Just who did
they think they were
these “father knows best” priests subjecting three young
two of which had not made their first confession. How disgusting so
many of them by Lucia's condemnation used
authority to bully a little boy and two little girls with trick
questions arising out of their own egos. How many mothers with little
ones of their own feel good about this truth and
treatment of one's so innocent?
It was exactly the same at Medjugorie. Unspeakable horrors occurred
was and is still probably a pastoral debacle, since
the original Bishop
it badly. Whose
it that brought
let heretics pronounce upon the presence of God.
Can you believe a schismatic pentecostal leader not of our faith
suddenly became an expert of the Holy Spirit and pronounced on the
validity of His presence?
am personally disgusted
on the authority claimed
by so many who make themselves experts on Heaven's works and actions.
I am doubly disgusted
by the priesthood, who desert the very priesthood of Christ and
great gift of
shepherding they have,
there is not a single person outside the Catholic Sacrificial
Ministry can claim. They
share it with those interpreters
religions who cannot prove their claim to a sanctified
the priesthood given
in trust to Catholic
I do mean the
forgiveness of sins through
the three sacraments for the dead.
defend their point very arrogantly, setting aside the great
theological minds of the past, which none today can truly match, They
agree anyone can be saved outside the church. Just like rappers they
trash talk and never qualify the conditions that govern their words.
Why should they since vatican
2 these so called religious teachers and thinkers have never applied
one thought to their words. They have forgotten God's
in the Old Law and Christ's words in
the New were
always conditional. Every thou shalt and if you love Me is a
conditional dilemma for us all. It
is as Christ said, “If you love Me, you will keep My commandments”.
What are commandments what qualifies words as commandments? After
vatican 2 when every idea formulated by the Churchmen in the
at the end of
very open to personal opinions and
the Laity who rarely confesses
suddenly filled with the
Ghost, the Divine eternal Spirit of God and were therefore blessed in
a special way; that is with wisdom, knowledge and understanding; that
Divine Intellect and were therefore participating
fully in a life of grace and all that this phrase means. We
can claim as the rules have been eased we can now for the Holy
because no one has
their fruits and
what mouldy fruits most of them are and were. They claim holiness
is what we are, and yet does one see any sign of the virtues of religion
and true piety.
am ashamed to say many times in these later years have I heard in
baptized we are full of and never loose sanctifying grace. How
either a dreadful heresy or a belief that becomes
a passport to hell. I
it as a dreadful
open and welcoming. It will
without doubt or correction on anyone's part gain believers
of this new doctrine
a place in the eternal kingdom of hatred, despair and self loathing.
Any priest who bases his vocation on that premise is lacking in true
catechesis and should pay close attention to
his priesthood, because it is drifting
away from the
sacrificial ministry of Jesus Christ. By the way lock up the
confessionals and throw away the keys, they are no longer needed, we
have been baptized 'solemnly'
and are full of the Holy Spirit, full of the righteousness which
unites us to God in heaven. God has never in scriptures by the
new teachings in the Church,
His community, thrown anyone out. We
will be surprised to find some time in the future there is no one in
Hell or there is no hell. Adam
and Eve, knowing
must be very happy and
wonder what all the fuss was about. They were wronged when dismissed
from God's presence.
Cain likewise. Ezekiel was hearing satan when he promoted the fact
that, “the soul that sins dies” The present Pope in his off the
cuff remarks, especially on his plane trip when returning from
Brazil, shows why we should feel the days of Vatican 2, those so
confusing days when
now there is two meanings for the doctrines and articles of vatican
two answers to every question, are still in full strength, and
no prelate wants them or
allow them to be changed.
Church teaches that for every power etc in the Church they
opposed by a corresponding false idol of some kind of principality or
power. In fact with the two faced voices or
speaking with two mouths
in the church we can say and not doubt that one of the biggest idol
that drives and tempts the church today is Janus, the two faced
Rome. Look at the bad catechism the Pope taught on that flight
returning to Rome, as long as we or person of whatever disorder goes
to confession and makes a good confession, who is the Pope to deny
him a place at the altar as minister or as a receiving lay person.
What utter balderdash since Francis
never qualified his remarks with
the correct teaching. He made it seem
once confessed he or she is shriven forever of that sin. Here
is how I was taught what it should be by the late
Don Newman and in my youth by Canon William Percival Hayes.
one has a sinful habit that reoccurs and is sometimes the urge is so
cannot be resisted, then
weekly confession is a necessity and
it is of paramount importance to save our own soul.
I welcome catholic
adulterers and other assorted scallywags among whom
I can be found, into the Church if the parish priest says he is ready
to receive Holy
is the crux of the matter. It is the priest the defender of the
Eucharist who has that decision to make. I
went through a time when I needed to
way to receive. I went to Fr Newman weekly as he told me not to come
to him for communion if
I did not attend
confession weekly to him.
was our secret of the confessional and I was glad to use by his
tell this to a catholic, orthodox in his Latin
advice for my soul would
certainly not be
liberal catholic obscurantist. Priests do
who will obey them and
yet they still throw the truly observant laity to the wolves.
all I knew he told other priests
that I was under his spiritual care and they
should send me back to him. The
same goes for any sin, secularly
married couples, adulterers,
must make every effort to stay celibate as
for whatever reason
or others who should not receive Holy Communion because they are as
we used to say, “Fallen Catholics”. Here
is the problem with the Church many priests are too frightened to
as a practice. They are frightened that complaints will
be made to the Bishop. They
know from the war in the trenches,
will make lots of trouble. I find from conversations with many
catholics they no longer count on
confession as a worthwhile sacrament to
it or could it be said that the very minor possession through a
mortal sin causes the possessor, as the rite of exorcism says to be
frightened of the sacraments. After all in retrospect the Absolution
given is surely a minor exorcism and who wants to return to hell?
Pope should have qualified his remarks as
he said is to open to personal interpretation. Janus
triumphs again and again. Can we say, since so many agree that the
documents of vatican
2 are easily to be
used for personal interpretations, and can be use to mean
many things. It
a small number of prelates admit, “they are confusing”. Therefore
Janus the god of vatican 2 for some. Is there
that will not admit errors so malicious and never ask for forgiveness
from the orthodox believer so scandalized by all they hear,
so different from what they were
is for me a
church turned upside down and for me so different to
my catholic father, teachers,
sisters and priests taught
dreadful new teaching on a baptism of desire, the lack of necessity
for the Confessional, the tacit acceptance of receiving Jesus while
using birth control, the tacit acceptance of abortions, women on the
altar, eucharistic ministers and
no altar rails all against God or Christ's ordinances in scriptures.
problem for me is parishes
baptismal certificates. The
parish I am in does not know how many are not baptized or how many
are on their second marriage, whether
their first was annulled or were never
not married in
the Church. Do
the majority of parishioners care?
think they do,
we are all to
does this do for priests? It widens their
comfort zone. It
same as in
business today, what the boss does not know he can deny all knowledge
he is untouched by blame. There
is no sense of responsibility. If
there is just one blasphemous communion in a diocese or a parish,
Jesus knows and at the particular judgement He will ask for an
the priest for the soul he has lost.
He will ask did you do nothing to protect me from the unjust, the
will you answer Priests?
How will you answer as you look around the
see your sinful lost
witness to your sacrileges? You, the sheep, how will you answer
especially when Holy Michael the Archangel gave the Children a prayer
at Fatima to atone and make reparation to the Trinity for
the iniquities, the in-differences, the insults, the sacrileges and
the blasphemies heaped
upon the Most Holy sacrifice of His Altar followed
by the plea
that those sinners would be converted.
it you or most of us dismiss the events at Fatima and not necessary
for our salvation or not worthy of belief? Most
priests do not know or even seem to want to know the status of the
souls in their charge. Souls
and all important responsibility.
is not good just to pray for your sheep, it is a lack of fortitude,
must actively work for their salvation by teaching and catechesis.
you bear to say the Confiteor at mass especially the,
have failed to do part”. How
will be reminded
they see Christ at their particular judgement. Good Luck to you all
I urge you who read this you do not have to accept these words from
my mind, but you must for the sake of your souls check its veracity.
Take a copy or forward it on by e mail to your parish priest and get
his opinion. Be brave for you too will be at fault if you do not
remind your priest to be a priest. Find some intestinal fortitude of
your own to save the souls of our priests.
Blessed and Immaculate Mary give our Priest your special blessing and
always hold him close to your Immaculate Heart
Labels: catechism, Fatima, Grace, Grace Fatima Jesus, Jesuit, Lucia, Mary, Masorete, medjugorie, Priest, salvation, Vatican 2